A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2019 High-class 3918" sold one-person B and smartphones at a middle-class store and received sales proceeds, and decided to receive insurance proceeds from a radio operator after reporting the loss of the smartphone and receive insurance proceeds from the radio operator and acquire B.

On October 2019, the Defendant, in collusion with B, received from B “E” near the subway Station located in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City, in collusion with B, and received from B 10 gallon “Sgal jums” (IMFF) , and then received from B the same month.

7. At around 14:00, Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G stores “J” of Hho Lakes I, the said smartphones were sold as if they were sold normally, and the victim was given KRW 6.50,000 as the price.

However, the fact that the defendant sold smartphones to the victim, and immediately reported the loss to the radio operator, was thought that the victim could not use the above smartphone.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 650,00 from the victim.

"2019 Highest 4394"

1. On June 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, at K’s mobile phone sales stores located in Yangsan-si, the Defendant: (b) purchased the victim M with an agreement of two years for a gallon to purchase S10 smartphones when gallon has lost a mobile phone; (c) once again, the machines are released first of all due to any clerical error in the domestic store.

However, the defendant was well aware of the fact that he was unable to open a mobile phone without the consent of his legal representative because he became majority at the time, and even if he was aware that he was willing to sell the smartphones received from the victim immediately in the middle store of the mobile phone, he did not want to pay the smartphones to the victim unless he was visited at night, such as credit inquiry and opening of the mobile phone, and did not want to pay the smartphones.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is deceiving him.