logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.10.23 2014고단956 (1)
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

However, Defendant C and D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 956"

1. Defendant A’s co-principal with Defendant A advertised the contents of “purchase without gathering smartphone” and “one level nationwide of the purchase of lost smartphones” on H and Internet block, provided funds for purchase of mobile phones to the employed I, J, K, and L so that they would purchase lost or stolen mobile phones from the persons who reported and contacted the said advertisement, and conspired to sell the purchased mobile phone to M.

Defendant

A receives a contact from H and N around January 13, 2013 to sell its acquired mobile phone. Defendant A opened the purchase fund of H with H, and H informed I of N’s contact with the said I, and H, at around 21:20 on the same day, notified the said I of the purchase fund of the purchase fund of H, and notified I of N’s contact with the said I of the contact information. At around 21:20 on the street near the subway station located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the victim’s O was lost at KRW 90,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 3 mobile phone 1 mobile phone at the market price of KRW 9,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

3. Until December 13, 198, I, J, and K had them purchase 31 times in total with the knowledge of the fact that the market price is 3,2310,000 won or more of cell phoness.

Accordingly, Defendant A acquired stolen goods in collusion with H.

The Defendants of the 2014 Highest 2169, “the 2014 Highest 20169” purchased smartphones from taxi engineers who acquire smartphones between customers, and dismantled and packages them into liquid, machine, and main body, and then sent them to Vietnam through international stacks, in consultation with the purchasing policies, Defendant A and B advertised with the contents such as “purchase without a smartphone” on the Internet block, “one nationwide purchase of lost smartphones,” and “one national level of purchase of lost smartphones.”

arrow