logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012. 11. 29. 선고 2012두20816 판결
(심리불속행) 부득이한 사유 없이 수도권 밖에 소재하는 주택을 취득한 경우 1세대 1주택 특례규정 적용하지 아니함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court 2012Nu569 ( August 30, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2010 Mine3538 ( October 28, 2011)

Title

(C) Where a house located outside the Seoul Metropolitan area is acquired without any inevitable reason, the special provisions on one house for one household shall not apply.

Summary

(C) Where a house located in the Seoul Metropolitan Area is transferred to a local area outside the Seoul Metropolitan Area and a house located in the Seoul Metropolitan Area is transferred to another local area due to unavoidable reasons, such as working conditions, after acquiring a house located outside the Seoul Metropolitan Area without any inevitable reasons, the special provisions on one house for one household shall not apply.

Cases

2012Du20816 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

XX

Defendant-Appellee

Head of the North Mine District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court Decision 2012Nu569 Decided August 30, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant’s grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow