logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 03. 14. 선고 2012두26739 판결
(심리불속행) 질병의 요양 기타 부득이한 사유로 주택을 양도한 것으로 인정하기 어려움[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu16857 ( November 09, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

National Tax Service Review and Transfer 2011-0074 (Law No. 29, 2011)

Title

(C) It is difficult to recognize that a house is transferred due to illness, medical care or other unavoidable reasons.

Summary

In the case of transfer of a house which has resided for not less than one year (the substance of the original trial) due to illness, medical care or other unavoidable reasons, it is difficult to deem that the house is transferred by transferring the house after two years or more from the time the spouse received medical treatment, not from the time of transfer, but from the time of transfer of the house due to illness, medical care or other unavoidable reasons.

Cases

2012du26739 The revocation of disposition imposing capital gains tax;

Plaintiff-Appellant

BAA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Si Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu16857 Decided November 9, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow