The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of misunderstanding the facts, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby finding the Defendants guilty, even though the Defendants conspired to interfere with the receipt of documents to participate in the victim company's tender and interfered with the fairness of the above apartment guard bid.

B. The sentence that the court below sentenced the Defendants (Defendant A: a fine of one million won, a fine of seven hundred thousand won, and a fine of seven hundred thousand won for Defendant C) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the lower court’s determination on the assertion of mistake of facts, it can be sufficiently recognized that at the time of the instant case, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants to receive bid documents of the victim company seeking to participate in the bid for the selection of a station for guard of the instant apartment complex, and that G, the head of the victim company, who visited the said apartment management office, interfere with the business of receiving documents to participate in the victim company’s tender by force by preventing G from submitting bid documents, and at the same time, impairing the fairness of the said apartment guard bid.

Therefore, we cannot accept the Defendants’ assertion of mistake of the above facts.

① G은 수사기관 이래 원심 법정에 이르기까지, 당시 피해자 회사에서 이 사건 아파트 경비용 역업체 선정을 위한 입찰에 참가하려고 위 아파트 관리사무소에 들어가 관리사무소 직원에게 입찰서류를 제출하려고 하자, 입주민인 피고인 B가 직원에게 큰소리로 ‘ 접수를 받으면 안 된다’ 고 하면서 피고인 A과 C을 불렀고, 피고인들이 자신을 둘러싸더니 ‘F 은 안 된다, 개 같은 것 들이 염치도 없이 뻔뻔하다, 자기들이 못 오니까 영감을 보냈네

“.” The Defendants said that they interfere with the receipt of documents.

Dr. Doz.