logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.10.07 2014고정813
입찰방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C During the end of August, 2009, while working as the head of the above apartment management office at the Gu D Apartment Management Office, in relation to the bidding for the selection of the construction project for the roof of the above apartment roof waterproof, C recommended to prepare a bid document, such as a written estimate, in accordance with the expected successful bid price, by informing friendly E of the bid price and the expected successful bid price of another company participating in the above construction project.

E obtained the expected successful bid price from C in advance, and notified the Defendant, as seen above, after having to undergo a bid in the name of G Co., Ltd. operated by F, the Defendant prepared a false statement of the actual performance of construction work with E, as if he had actual performance of roof construction works, and prepared a written estimate at will according to the expected successful bid price known through C, regardless of actual construction costs, and submitted bid documents, such as a statement of actual performance and estimate, to the management office of the apartment.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with C and E in order, thereby harming the fairness of bidding by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of C and E;

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. A report on internal investigation (Submission of data on reporters: Documents, etc. related to bidding for roof waterproof and waterproof works);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the details of standard contracts, estimates, and false records of performance of construction works, and the details of the estimates submitted by the F (revision of the estimated cost of Brazil);

1. Relevant Article 315 of the Criminal Act and Articles 315 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow