The part of the lawsuit of this case (attached Form 1) seeking the revocation of the penalty surcharge payment order shall be dismissed.

The plaintiff's remainder.

1. Fact that there is no dispute over basic facts [based for recognition], Gap 1-1, 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. The Plaintiff et al.’s status as the Plaintiff et al., Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) and Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd.’ (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.’ in the name of the company”) are the Plaintiff, etc.’s 14 construction companies, including the Plaintiff’s 7 large construction companies, and the 14 construction companies including the Plaintiff et al., and the 21 construction companies, including the mountain field construction industry, consideration for the development, extreme construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, joint construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, scopic construction, and one new construction company (hereinafter “Plaintiff 271, etc.”).

B. Construction works for high-speed railroads with the outline of construction works for 13 high-speed railroads for construction works for the 13 high-speed railroads, mean construction works for construction works for high-speed railroads with the length of 184.534 km which is the total length of the transmission, factory owners, Doksan, Jung-Eup, and Gwangju, and a large-scale government project with the project cost of KRW 8.352.9 billion which is promoted to form a axis for traffic and life, together with high-speed railroads for the Republic of Korea. Construction works for high-speed railroads for new construction works for high-speed railroads were ordered for 19 construction sections, and two sections for 1-1 sections and 3-2 sections for 1-2 sections, 1-2 sections, 1-4 sections, 2-3 sections and 4-2 sections for 4 sections by the method of alternative, and 5 sections for construction works which the plaintiff participates in the bidding as a representative of joint supply and demand contractors.