logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.28 2016고단1814
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes in the Incheon District Court on March 25, 2016, and such judgment is the same year.

4.2. Finality has been established.

1. Forgery and events of a resident registration certificate re-issuance application;

A. On November 13, 2013, the Defendant, at the D community service center located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 10:0, 2013, entered the item column for personal information and the name, resident registration number, telephone number, address, etc. of each E in the column for personal information of the subject and the applicant’s personal information column, and forged an application for re-issuance of the resident registration certificate under the name of E, a private document on proof of facts, with the signature of E in the applicant column.

B. At the same time and place, the Defendant issued an application for re-issuance of a forged resident registration certificate as if it were a document duly formed.

2. Counterfeit and use of an application for re-issuance of a driver's license;

A. On November 13, 2013, at around 11:00, the Defendant forged an application for re-issuance of a driver’s license under the name of E, a private document on proof of fact by signing the applicant column, using a black pen on the paper “application for re-issuance of a driver’s license,” which was kept at the place, and using a black pen to enter the applicant’s personal information column, E’s name, resident registration number, address, etc., and forged the application for re-issuance of a driver’s license under the name of E, a private document on proof of fact, for the purpose of exercising the applicant column.

B. At the same time and place, the Defendant: (a) delivered an application for re-issuance of a forged driver’s license to a police officer in charge of being aware of the forgery as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.

arrow