(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단1354

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단1354

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Before separation, the co-defendant C gets a damaged D's driver's license in the name of the damaged D's license, and the same is similar to D's license, and the defendant A gets re-issued, and gets a mobile phone in the name of D by using the re-issued D's driver's license, and divide the profits therefrom by selling it in the middle and high speed.

Defendant A and the joint Defendant E consented thereto before separation.

1. The defendant and the above C and E entered into the G driver’s license test site located in F on February 6, 2017, and the defendant A entered the application form for the re-issuance of the driver’s license in the column of the applicant form for the re-issuance of the driver’s license which was kept there, as D’, in the column of the petitioner form for the vehicle that was located there, "J’s petition form HI, telephone number column, and in the column of the applicant column for the mobile phone, and submitted the application form for re-issuance of the forged driver’s license as D’s license as above to the non-employee of the G driver’s license test site that was not aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above C and E, forged a copy of an application for re-issuance of a driver's license in the name of D, a private document on the duty of rights, and exercised it.

2. On February 6, 2017, Defendant A and the above C and E, along with “M agency,” which is a mobile phone agent located in the Cheongju-gu L, Cheongju-si, and via D’s mobile phone N andO, Defendant A entered the personal information of “D” in each service contract’s customer column, and Defendant A entered the personal information of “E” in the aforementioned new service contract’s customer column, and Defendant A submitted two copies of the forged D’s new service contract to Defendant A as if they were duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above C and E, has the right to exercise.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.07.19 2018고정191

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.08.18 2016고정652

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.09 2016고정847

-수원지방법원 2016.04.21 2016고단1252

-청주지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단1354 (1)