Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From August 2012, the Defendant, who became aware of sexual traffic brokerage sites through sexual traffic, was engaged in sexual traffic, and the physical characteristics, etc. of the sexual traffic are specified in detail on the sexual traffic brokerage sites. In addition, the Defendant considered that the sexual intercourse with the relevant women was viewed.
Accordingly, the Defendant, as the owner of an officetel commercial sex acts, committed the act as if the Defendant were the owner of the commercial sex acts, and posted an advertisement for soliciting women to engage in commercial sex acts to enter his and her sexual intercourses with the women who had a physical characteristics, etc. on the site that can be seen as harming their sexual intercourses. The Defendant was willing to collect money by photographing the pictures of the other women under the pretext of placing them on the site, and by threatening them to spread them.
On March 29, 2014, the Defendant posted an advertisement “D” on the NAV Kaf, D. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sent to the victim E (the age 42) who reported and contacted the said advertisement to engage in commercial sex acts; (b) was required to have his/her sexual intercourse with the victim E (the age 42), and to affix his/her photo on his/her body. Since then, around 16:00 on April 29, 2014, the Defendant was engaged in commercial sex acts in a room where it is impossible to identify the Gel care room located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon; and (c) made one time a sexual intercourse with the victim and sexual intercourse. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant, who did not know the sexual intercourse with the victim on his/her face at the Seo-gu website on the Special Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (the name of the victim on April 160, 2014.
The Defendant, as seen above, taken the victim’s face pictures, using a camera function contained in his/her cell phone, and taken a copy of his/her face of the victim’s face.
This is the defendant.