logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.02.05 2014고단1464
상해등
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:50 on September 25, 2014, the Defendant, while drunkd in D’s front way in the Sinmi Sin Sin Sin Sinsi, was under dispute with the workplace fare. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was the police officer belonging to the police box of the old police station, who was called upon 112, and called out after receiving the 112 report, and was removed from F; (b) was tightly sealed with F with his head and chest; and (c) was faced with F’s loss on the front side of the signboard where he was carrying his hand; and (d) the victim F (28 years of age) was faced with F’s loss for about 8 weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning patrol and suppression of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made to G and F;

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. 내사보고(피해자 F 진술조서 미첨부 및 현장사진), 내사보고(112신고처리표 등 첨부), 수사보고(피해 경�관 순경 F의 피해사진 붙임)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of serious bodily injury);

1. It is not the first case of a selective fine of punishment, but the crime of the judgment is limited to a police officer performing official duties, and the degree of injury suffered by the victimized police officer is very serious. However, it is not the crime of contingent crime committed while drunkly during the company ceremony, and the victim was not the victim's scambling, and the victim was the victim's scambling after the occurrence of alcohol. After the occurrence of alcohol, the victim was the victim's scambling with the victim, and the victim was the victim's scambling, and the court also led to the confession of the crime.

arrow