A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2014, at around 05:20, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the celb in Gumi-si B; (b) had been asked to ask questions about personal information from E by the police officer affiliated with the Gumi Police Station D commander of the Gumi Police Station called “Woo woo woo”, and went out of the mother telecom.

The Defendant continued to listen from E to the word “where the house is my house”, and expressed to E “this flab humb”, and made a drinking flab on the right side of E one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' patrol and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (E public official identification cards, copies of work logs, and copies of damaged photographs);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;