A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2014, at around 22:30, the Defendant, at the 'C' restaurant located in the Gumi-si B, drinked alcoholic beverage along with the work fare and argued for the issue of payment of the drinking value. On September 2, 2014, the Defendant heard the horses that he would pay the drinking value and return home from the D District E of the Gu American Police Station D District, which was dispatched after receiving 112 report, and called “E”, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to “I am am am me am me am me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me us us us

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' patrol and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the same Act), even though the period of ten years has not elapsed, there is no previous conviction or more for the last ten years, and there is no previous conviction or more for

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;