The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. The judgment of the court below against the defendants in summary of the grounds for appeal (the defendant A: imprisonment of one year and two months, confiscation, imprisonment of one year and one year and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is judged that the defendants provided personal information leaked to a third party without the consent of the owner of the information, and the amount of personal information leaked to be used without the consent of the owner of the information reaches 60 million won, and the quality of the crime is inferior; the defendant Eul provided personal information to the defendant Eul in return for compensation; the defendant Eul actually used the personal information so acquired, etc., are disadvantageous to the defendants; however, the defendants acknowledged the crime of this case; the defendant Eul is the first offender; the defendant Eul is the first offender; the profits acquired by the crime of this case are not expected to be small; the personal information actually used by the defendant Eul appears to be less than the leaked personal information; the crime is not abused; the defendant Eul was divided into the crime of this case; and the defendant Eul used 10 million won to the welfare organization of the community; the defendant's age, character and behavior of the defendants; and the conditions for sentencing after the crime of this case, etc., the defendant Eul's allegation that the above defendants' defense counsel's punishment and punishment are unfair.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendants' appeal is reasonable, and the judgment below is ruled again after pleading.

Criminal facts

The facts constituting the crime and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are stated in the judgment below's 1-B.

Of the ports 1 and 2-b.

Each of the "Preambles" in the first parallel of the ports shall be "Preambles from April 2012 to June 2013", respectively.