logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.25 2014노1187
사문서위조등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment of each fine of KRW 3 million sentenced by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendants recognized each of the crimes of this case and are against the law, economic difficulties, Defendant B suffers from high blood pressure, Defendant A suffers from high blood pressure, and Defendant B has no record of criminal punishment until now after 193, and Defendant A has no record of criminal punishment until now since 1983, and there is no record of criminal punishment other than fines.

However, each of the crimes of this case is alleged to have committed each of the crimes of this case in a way that the defendants conspired to forge the certificate of borrowing in the name of the complainant and submit it to the court for filing an application for payment order. Through this order, one copy of resident registration card in the name of the complainant was issued by the court for the correction of address from the court. In order to acquire personal information, the crime was committed by using the court, and the crime was not defective, and the defendants did not constitute each of the crimes of this case. However, in order to find the complainant according to the net I malm, the defendants were alleged to have committed each of the crimes of this case. However, the fact appears to have been found that the F et al. expressed the intent that the complainant would be punished against the defendants during the investigation process, and considering the following factors, comprehensively taking into account the defendants' age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment against the defendants is unreasonable.

Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendants' appeal is justified.

arrow