1. On September 17, 2011, the Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A KRW 20,817,834; (b) to Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively; and (c) to each of the said money.

1. Basic facts (based on recognition) Gap 1, 7 through 15, 24 through 28, 31, 32, and 33 (hereinafter “the deceased”) were hospitalized in the defendant hospital on July 2, 201 and received surgery from the defendant.

From the time of the operation, the deceased complained of the pain of the operation, and 10 times or more a day on the part of the deceased, and during that period, the madne of red dney has continued to change.

Before the Deceased’s operation (on June 27, 201), the Hague Logle/Hmacart number was 8.6/29.9, but was lowered by 5.8/20 on July 9, 201.

On July 11, 2011, the Deceased was hospitalized in a hospital affiliated with the Kugwon University on the part of the deceased and was subject to an internal border test. As a result, the deceased did not have to secure a large amount of vision at the time of entry into the port, and it was shown that he was viewed that he did not appear at the time of entry into the downstream, etc., and was treated with blood transfusions, blood transfusions, and blood transfusions, etc. around July 22, 201, and was discharged from the above hospital on August 6, 201.

Nevertheless, the Deceased had been treated by the Defendant Hospital on August 11, 201, and on September 25, 201, and on September 3, 2011, the deceased had been hospitalized in the H Hospital located in Y in Yasan-si, with symptoms such as antipathal, antipathal, antipathal, antipathic, and low blood transfusion, etc. (the deceased was treated twice at the Defendant Hospital and the GUUD Hospital affiliated with the original university during the period of hospitalization), and died on September 17, 2011.

Plaintiff

A is the husband of the deceased, and the rest of the plaintiffs are the children of the deceased.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the result of the appraisal of medical records on the head of the Save Hospital Hospital, the following circumstances acknowledged by the purport of the entire pleadings, the deceased’s death may be presumed to have occurred due to the instant surgery, etc. received from the Defendant.

Therefore, the defendant is the deceased who suffered from the defendant's negligence.