beta
Text
1. The Defendants: KRW 46,115,68; KRW 36,289,68; and KRW 36,289,684, respectively, to each of the Plaintiff and the designated parties.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The relationship between the parties (1) The plaintiff is the husband of the deceased E (hereinafter "the deceased"), and the plaintiff (the appointed party) and the appointed party are the children of the deceased.
(2) The Defendant medical corporation (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) is a legal entity operating G hospital located in Ulsan-gu F, Ulsan-gu, and Defendant D works as the head of the outside medical department at the Defendant hospital, while serving as the head of the outside medical department at the Defendant hospital.
B. (1) On October 201, the Deceased was found on the part of the upper ray sprink, and the Defendant hospital was diagnosed as A’s upper ray sprinke, and the Defendant hospital was diagnosed as the result of the organizational examination, and was given regular medical examination to Defendant D at the Defendant hospital on a regular basis.
(2) At around 2012, there was a new fry from the deceased’s upper fry, and the Defendant hospital performed the instant surgery at the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “instant surgery”). The Deceased was hospitalized at the Defendant hospital on April 26, 2012, and received the instant surgery from Defendant D from around 9:45 to 12:45 of the same month.
C. (1) On April 27, 2012, the Deceased’s death (1) appealed from the instant surgery, and on April 27, 2012, the nurses in charge of the Defendant Hospital complained of the eural PCA and the eural PCA, respectively.
(2) At around 17:20 on the same day, Defendant D, a principal doctor, visited in order to kill the deceased’s condition, and the plaintiffs sent the deceased’s side that they had a large number of pains, and complained of pains. However, Defendant D, who explained that the pulmon and voice of the patient were humped, and that the hump was humped through a exhaust pipe.
(3) When the Deceased complained of a pain on the part of the operation performed at around 18:30 on the same day, the nurse H appeals against the Defendant D.