1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a school juristic person operating thecheon-gu National University Hospital (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”). On March 2, 2011, the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant’s liability for medical expenses incurred in the course of surgery and hospitalized treatment at the Plaintiff Hospital, as the children of the net B (hereinafter “the deceased”).

On March 2, 2011, the Deceased was hospitalized in the process of the diagnosis and operation of the climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic cli

Plaintiff

On March 7, 2011, the hospital conducted an electrical examination of the deceased's name-based video recording on the date of hospitalization with respect to the deceased, and conducted a diagnosis of the deceased's symptoms by taking account of the results, the hospital diagnosed the deceased's symptoms as a climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatics, and planned the pressure of the deceased's climatic c

On March 9, 2011, the Deceased was carried out at the time outside of the hospital of the Plaintiff on March 9, 201, 3-6 aftermathical cliff, and 4-5 aftermathical cliffic cliffic cliffic cliffic cliffic cliffic cliffic cliffic cliffic cli

After the operation, the Plaintiff hospital disinfected the operation department every day for the creative management after the operation.

After March 11, 2011, the Deceased repeated the time, place, and people's king and aggravation of the male power. On March 12, 2011 and March 13, 2011, the Deceased saw that sound was not locked but vain, or vain.

On March 13, 2011, the Plaintiff hospital took brain self-explosive images against the Deceased, and requested a cooperation with Thealology on March 15, 201 and March 30, 201. On the basis of the content received on March 18, 2011, the Plaintiff hospital received a reply by requesting a cooperation with the Mental Health Department, and on the basis of the content received on March 18, 2011, the Plaintiff hospital took an excessive behavior (e.g., s., s., s.g., s., s., s.g., s., s., s.g., s., s., s.g., s., s.s., s.) and s.g., s.