A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for murder in the Gwangju District Court's branch for the purpose of attempted murder, and was released on February 28, 2013 in the course of the execution of the sentence by the Ganbuk Vocational Training Prison, but the same year.

4. 28. The same year as a crime has been committed against damage to public goods and the parole is revoked;

9. 29. The South-North prison shall complete the remaining sentence.

1. At around 02:00 on December 1, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by cutting down the bridges or E spathing the spath of the police box, on the ground that the police officer E, who was under investigation by the spath police box located in the Dondo Police Station C, engaged in the search of the motor vehicle that he driven while driving the spath and leaving the spath of the spath of the police box.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods, as described in paragraph (1), interfered with the police officer’s performance of official duties, and thereby, damaged the amount equivalent to 20,000 won at the market price on the above gate, which is the next public goods, by walking a string of the strings that he was seated on the Don Police Station D police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. An investigation report (in cases of damage to public goods, attaching photographs to the scene of the case);

1. Investigation report (to attach CCTV data inside a police box at the time of the incident that is damaged to the public goods);

1. Previous records before ruling: Application of criminal records, reply reports (E) and Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of prisoners search;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment), the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of damaging goods for public use and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 37 former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant not only was in need of mental treatment due to depression of mental disorder at the time of the instant crime, but also that he is in a state of mental disorder under the influence of alcohol.

However, each of the above.