Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for seven months and for seven months, respectively.

Criminal facts

【The Defendants were married couple’s records of crime, and at the Busan District Court on August 17, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for each of the six months of imprisonment, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 2016.

The Busan District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 1645 was the last concurrent crimes in this case.

On the other hand, on January 10, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years in imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on the same day, and the appeal is in progress at the Busan District Court on January 10, 2017.

【Crimes】

1. From around 2013, the Defendants: (a) from around 2013, in the course of operating a main store in the Seosan-dong in Busan, the Defendants: (b) leased an officetel with low operating margin and credit cards; (c) leased the officetel in Busan to the extent of monthly rent; and (d) conspired to acquire money by means of fraud, etc. with the lessor’s consent as if he would obtain the lessor’s consent while entering into a lease agreement on a high deposit with the victim’s Z; and (c) subsequently, (d) obtained the lessor’s consent.

The Defendants conspired to the effect that on November 8, 2015, at the AB coffee shop 1 floor located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, Defendant A falsely saw on the Internet as the transition of the AC building 606 in Busan-gu, Busan-do, and the transition price is KRW 70 million for the middle, and 30 million for the 30 million won to make a sub-face-to-face, and 40 million for the first time at the maturity of 2 years. Defendant B made a false representation to the victim as the actual owner of AD.

However, in fact, the Defendants’ above AC Officetel Nos. 606 KRW 1 million.