Seoul High Court-2012-Na56469 (Law No. 10, 2013)

(D) The instant divorce payment contract is a fraudulent act, and the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to recognize the good faith of the Defendant.

(Summary) The instant divorce payment contract constitutes a fraudulent act by exceeding a considerable degree pursuant to the purport of Article 839-2(2) of the Civil Act. The evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to reverse the presumption and to recognize the Defendant’s good faith.

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act

2013Da205952 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Korea

literatureA

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na56469 Decided May 10, 2013

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal are examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by