logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.13 2012가합17160
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs agreed to operate a general game room as a club business. The Plaintiffs agreed to operate the general game room as a club business. The ratio of shares between Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B is 45:55, and Plaintiff A invested 50 game software units and 5 game software units, and Plaintiff B provided the game room business place. The Plaintiffs provided the game room business place from August 22, 2009 to September 22, 2009 (hereinafter “the instant entertainment room”). The Plaintiffs are “Dsung entertainment room” located in Suwon-si C (hereinafter “the instant entertainment room”).

3) In the foregoing game machine, 55 games (hereinafter “instant game machine”).

(2) The screen of the above high-saw game machine includes “CREIT” and “NK”. If a customer puts cash in the game machine, the game score equivalent to the cash amount invested in the “CREIT” and the award score acquired in the “BNK” will be accumulated if the customer obtains the score by using the game.

If a customer has a game with both the CRED IT's original game score and the BNK's original award score, he first used it in the game, and the above award score has become more serious, the employee of the entertainment room in this case has recorded and recorded the total of the original award points in the game machine "CREDIT's original game score and the BNK's original award points in the game machine, and then had his employee or customer use the game in this case after putting the amount equivalent to the recorded mark in the game room in the above game machine.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant act of keeping the score”. The instant game machine was rated to ensure that the maximum amount of use per hour does not exceed 10,000 won.

B. On September 8, 2009, the police arrested Plaintiff B as an offender in the act of violating the Game Industry Promotion Act and confiscated the game machine of this case on the same day.

arrow