logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.03.11 2013나2013465
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims added to the plaintiffs' appeal and the trial are all dismissed.

2. Costs of appeal.

Reasons

The basic facts of the plaintiffs agreed to operate a general game room as a club business, and determined the share ratio between the plaintiff A and the plaintiff B as 45:55, and the plaintiff A invested 50 game units and 50 game units for the hulullar-hululululululululul, and the plaintiff B provided the game room business place.

The Plaintiffs, from August 22, 2009 to September 9, 2009, installed 55 game equipment (hereinafter “instant game equipment”) at the “Dived Nature Entertainment Center” located in Suwon-si C (hereinafter “instant game equipment”) and operated a general game room.

The game of this case was rated so that the maximum amount of use per hour does not exceed 10,000 won.

On the screen of the above high-saw game machine, there is a window and bank (BNK). If a customer puts cash into a game machine, the game score equivalent to the cash put into the game room is marked, and if the customer obtains the score by using the game, the prize score obtained in the bank hold is accumulated.

If a customer conducts a game in the state that there are both the game score of the Cred's creative game and the monetary score of the bank, the game score of the Cred's creative game will be used first in the game, and when the above monetary score has been sred, the game score of Cred's creative game will be used.

Upon completion of a game, the Plaintiffs recorded the total of the game scores in the game machine and the prize scores in the bank. The Plaintiffs: (a) cash equivalent to the points recorded by the relevant customer when he/she finds another game; (b) the Plaintiffs or employees put them in the game machine; or (c) provided them to customers to enable them to play the game again by inserting them in the game machine.

(hereinafter referred to as "the act of keeping the score of this case". The police, around September 22, 2009, consulted E, a member of the Game Rating Board, that "the act of keeping the amount of money to be received or invested by customers in the game room is illegal as it is an illegal business, so it may be controlled."

arrow