logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고정796
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 12:00 on December 17, 2018, the Defendant discovered the victim C who was considered as the other party in front of the husband’s 12th female toilets in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, 2018, and brought the victim’s head debt by flicking the victim’s head debt by flicking the victim’s hand, and assaulted the victim’s head debt again by flicking the victim’s head debt.

2. The Defendant, at the date, time, and place under paragraph (1) of this Article, thought that his husband and the victim C are influenced persons, and repeatedly expressed a false fact to the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, such as “If her husband and her husband consider that the victim’s husband are influenced persons, and the victim’s workplace charges were observed, the victim’s warning was given two (2) years before her inside, but the victim continued to talk with her phone and her talked and talked with her talking and talking, and the victim’s talked with her husband

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of C, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photograph of victim head;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act (e.g., the point of violence and the selection of fines) that apply to criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment prescribed for heavier defamation);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act lies in recognizing and opposing the instant crime.

On the other hand, the defendant did not agree with the victim or receive any accusation from the victim.

The defendant has been punished for the same crime.

In the above circumstances, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of crime, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as ordered by considering the following circumstances.

arrow