All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the defendant A: the fine of KRW 5 million; the fine of KRW 7 million) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and it is necessary to make a good and strict punishment even in order to prevent the proliferation of illegal sexual traffic business establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the Defendants conspired to attract customers through the Internet site, etc. and engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic closely in the business of arranging sexual traffic. In light of the above criminal law, the crime is bad in light of the nature of the crime, the acts of arranging sexual traffic are repeated even though all the defendants had the power to be subject to criminal punishment on several occasions, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, happiness, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crimes, etc., the sentence against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.