logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.25 2014고단3290
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 05, 2014, while under the influence of alcohol around 05:34, a driver has a duty of care to verify the safety of course by properly examining the entire area and the left and right of the vehicle and prevent accidents by driving the vehicle at a safe speed and in order to prevent accidents by driving the vehicle at a safe speed.

Nevertheless, it is running in the same direction as two lanes due to negligence of driving while the defendant is negligent.

After the string of the D car driven by the victim C (Nam, 49 years old) who was in the traffic signal atmosphere, the string of the F car driven by the victim E (the 37 years old) who was in the front of the driver's seat of the passenger car and continued to show the string of the F car driven by the victim E (the 37 years old) who was in the front of the driver's seat of the passenger car, the string part of the F car driven by the Defendant was shocked by the front driver of the driver's seat before the driver's seat of the passenger car and shocked the string of H car driven by the victim G (the South, 70 years old) who was in the front of the driver's seat.

After all, the Defendant suffered from the foregoing negligence to D Automobile Drivers C (ma, 50 years old, F Vehicle Drivers E (V, 37 years old) and tensions and tensions for each two-day period of medical treatment. H Vehicle Drivers G (ma, 70 years old, 69 years old) and I (V, 69 years old), respectively, suffered cerebrs in need of two-day medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.083% on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, driven approximately 1.5 km from the day to the day before the Samsung Electronic Services in the same location in Gwangju Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

3. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, destroyed the amount of approximately KRW 1,532,672 of the D car per repair cost, with the F car equivalent to KRW 4,511,518 of the repair cost. H car was destroyed to KRW 1,469,004 of the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow