logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.09.03 2015고단2209
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bran vehicle.

Around 22:20 on May 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the said automobile, and continued to drive the said automobile into the front part of the automobile of the victim G (the 59-year-old driver), which was in the atmosphere of the victim E (the 41-year-old driver), who was in the air traffic at the front of the vehicle, due to occupational negligence when he neglected to perform his duties and neglected to do so, led to the part of the victim E (the 41-year-old driver) who was in the front of the vehicle in the front of the vehicle in the city of Gwangju. On the other hand, the Defendant was able to get the back part of the H wing driver of the said Y (the 59-year-old driver), which was in the atmosphere of the vehicle in Gwangju, into the front part of the observer car in the front of the vehicle in question. On the other hand, the above part of the victim I (the 48-year-old driver) who was in the atmosphere before the vehicle in question.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as scopical salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of both sides requiring approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim Party E, injury on the victim Party G, scopical salt ties, tensions, etc. requiring two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim Party I, and injury to the victim K (51 years of age) who is a passenger of the said scopic vehicle, on the part of the victim Party K (51 years of age) that requires two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim Party E, and did not immediately repair the scopic part of the said scopic part of the victim Party E, which is equivalent to KRW 6,01,432 of repair cost, and did not immediately repair the scopic part of the scopic part of the said scopic part, which is equivalent to KRW 4,300,932 of repair cost, and did not repair the victim Party 1616.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer with respect to E, G, and I.

arrow