logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.04.19 2012고합18
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On December 25, 2011, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with 0.237% of the blood alcohol concentration without a driver’s license of a motor vehicle on December 25, 201, led to the progress of the road of one-lane traffic in front of the 1199-2, Sinung-si, Sinsi-si, to the speed of the Silified Construction Authority, from the death rate dynamics.

At the same time, since vehicles were parked on both sides, the speed was reduced to prevent the collision of parked vehicles, and the steering direction and brakes were operated accurately. However, the defendant neglected to do so and operated the operation on the right side of the vehicle owned by the victim C, which was parked on the right side by negligence while neglecting it, was shocked with the front corner of the victim C, which was parked on the right side of the vehicle of the victim C, and the driver's seat of the victim EF E, which was parked on the right side of the course, was shocked with the front half of the steering line of the vehicle of the victim E, which was parked on the right side.

The Defendant continued to proceed with the same 1213-lane at the intersection of the same 1213-lane, and was negligent by converting the signal atmosphere from the front speed to the front speed in order to go straight from the office room of office room to the front speed of the above Aburged vehicle, which was driven by the victim G, who was in the signal atmosphere at the rear side of the said Aburged vehicle, into the front speed of the said Aburged vehicle of the said Aburged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures to ensure that the above car is equivalent to KRW 439,593 of the repair cost by occupational negligence as above, and that the above car is equivalent to KRW 569,547 of the repair cost, and that the above low-priced car is damaged to the repair cost of KRW 1,118,018,018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each written statement of C, E, and G;

1. A traffic accident report and an accident;

arrow