logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
광주지방법원 2016.12.08 2016고단3890
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a KS7 car.

On July 2, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without obtaining a driver's license at around 18:30 on July 2, 2016, and led to the driving of the said vehicle along the three-lane road in the Gwangju Mine-gu C along the two-lanes from the black mix distance outflow to the new area.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive by accurately manipulating the steering wheel and brakes, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the Defendant to take part of the part of the part of the victim E (W, 49 years old) driving, which was in the traffic signal at the front line of the same lane, as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and due to its shock, the said part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle was pushed down in the future, and the part of the front part of the victim G (57 years old) driving, which was in the atmosphere of the above signal, was in the front part, and the Defendant got the back part of the back part of the victim G (57 years old) driving, which was in the atmosphere of the above signal, and became in the front part of the said passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and committed an injury to the victim G at the chest straw, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the above low-speed car to ensure that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,893,840 of the repair cost would be equivalent to KRW 876,720 of the repair cost, and that the said high-speed car would be equivalent to KRW 234,520 of the repair cost, and then, the Defendant escaped without any necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. The actual situation survey report, the car driving license register, and the car driving certificate; and

arrow