Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:00 on July 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a criminal in fraud due to an unclaimed lane in Gangnam-gu Seoul Police Station C District District; and (b) was sent to the said district office by the police officer D with the background surrounding the said district office; (c) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was arrested as a criminal in fraud due to an unclaimed lane; (d) was under the influence of alcohol, and (e) continued to take a bath within the said district office, and went back to the said district office; and (e) was fluencing the Defendant, the Defendant was fluend by assaulting the Defendant, such as a defect that the said D might take the lock and walk back; and (e) was fluencing the chest of the said D, thereby obstructing the police officer’s order and the lawful performance of duties regarding criminal investigation.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act committed assaulting police officers, such as the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1, while under the influence of alcohol, and, as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant expressed that “the Defendant is shot, shot, and shot, to file a charge, shot, to shot, to shot, to shot, and to shot, to shot, to shot, to shot, to shot, to shot, and to shot, to shot, and to shot off the books located in the said global office.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of official duties), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. For the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant is committed by the police station without any justifiable reason against a police officer who is performing official duties, and the Defendant’s mistake that the instant crime was committed against the police officer, and that the instant crime was committed against him/her without any justifiable reason, such as that the instant case was dissatisfying and assaulting, and that the instant case was not dissatisfy, and the Defendant