logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.04.23 2013고정1480
도박
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around January 31, 201, the summary of the facts charged was connected to the gambling site operated by the Defendant in Seo-gu, Daejeon by using a computer at the “C” film room operated by the Defendant in Seo-gu, Daejeon, and transferred KRW 30,000 from the Agricultural Cooperative (E) in the name of the Defendant to the account (F) used by the Defendant in the name of the Defendant, and received the game money equivalent to the same amount from the above person in the name of the Defendant, and carried out an drum card gambling, referring to the drum card, e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.,

3. By June 3, 200, a total sum of KRW 29,230,000 was 116 times, such as the written list of offenses in the annexed sheet of crimes.

2. As to the above facts charged by the defendant, the defendant asserted that he made a false confession with the request from the five to six persons without the name of the defendant, and did not know whether the account was used for gambling. The defendant himself did not have any fact of gambling, and that the confession made by the police can be punished if the police officer in charge made a confession, and that the confession made a false confession with the purport that he may be detained if denied.

3. The police G's statement and bank reply (Evidence No. 5) that investigated the defendant as evidence to prove the facts charged in the instant case, and the police's protocol of interrogation of the defendant against the defendant is inadmissible as it denies its content.

However, although the witness G presented the list of crimes to the defendant at the time of the investigation and stated to the effect that it was confirmed, the investigation was conducted on the list of crimes in which the amount, etc. was found to be double times, and the prosecution was instituted as it is by the opinion of the prosecution. However, it was pointed out that the number of times and amount of the defendant were unfasible during the trial at the later time, and the investigation was conducted properly on the basis of objective data, such as making it clear.

arrow