logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.27 2017고단2477
특수절도등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

. The intent was to steal precious metal.

Accordingly, Defendant A set off from the above car and set up to I with precious metal for futures use, and Hamb Ham 1st 400,000 won at the market price of both parties and escaped promptly after boarding the above car in front and waiting at the alleys adjacent to this car.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with E and D, stolen both of them.

2. In collusion with E and D on May 27, 2016, the Defendants stolen the total market value equivalent to KRW 550,000,000,000 from the L of the Victim K (M, 69 years old) operation in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan CityJ in the same manner as Paragraph 1.

[2017 Highest 2847 (Defendant A)]

1. On April 17, 2016, the Defendant forged the document forgery and the above investigation document in the N Office located in M in Nam-si, Nam-si, the Defendant, without authority, made a false application form in the name column of the customer information, using the pentle, “O” in the resident number column, “P” in the resident number column, and “P” in the address column ************,” and “R” in the desired number column, signed by the applicant column and forged an application form in the name of O, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

After that, the defendant issued a forged application to Sk phone agency employees who are aware of the fact on the spot as if it were a document duly formed.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and place, filed an application for opening of a mobile phone in the name of O with the victim S, and submitted a forged application form in the name ofO and carried out as if the O was delegated by theO.

However, the defendant did not have obtained consent or delegation from O to open a mobile phone.

Nevertheless, the Defendant committed a false act as above, and the Defendant received from the injured party the delivery of the LG G5 mobile phone amounting to KRW 611,690 at the market price in the same place.

arrow