beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff’s status as the Plaintiff was appointed as a teacher at a middle and high school located in Jeollabuk-do on March 11, 1977, and worked as an assistant principal from March 1, 2013 to B high school (former Sejong High School) on March 1, 2013, and retired on February 28, 2017.
B. On April 11, 2014, the Defendant removed the Plaintiff from office pursuant to Article 73-3(1)3 of the State Public Officials Act on the grounds that the resolution of heavy disciplinary action is under way against the Plaintiff on the ground that he/she was against the Plaintiff, and on May 20, 2014, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Good Faith), 57 (Duty of Good Faith), 58 (Prohibition of Deserting from Office), and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Goods) of the State Public Officials Act as follows.
1. From June to December 2013, 2013: - Two times without permission, including the attendance at work on June 24, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "grounds for disciplinary action") - Two times, including the attendance at work on June 26, 2013, for an unspecified period of more than ten:30 hours; - Two times, including the attendance at work on October 1, 2013; 15:32 days (number): 15:32 days on October 2, 2013; 11:56 days on December 4, 2013; and 3 times on December 19, 2013; 10: 1: 1: 1: 4: 1: 1: 4: 1: 1; 25: 4: 1; 201; 2. 4: 1; 3: 4; 1; 2. 1; 2. 4; 1; 4; 1; 2. 4; 1; 4; etc. 1; 4; 1; 1; etc. 20
2. ‘A teacher’s travel for the purpose of tourism (hereinafter referred to as "the grounds for disciplinary action of Article 2) with respect to a person who is aware of his/her knowledge about his/her overseas travel during a semester for the purpose of treating his/her disease while leaving his/her knowledge about him/her during a semester,” for which he/she applied for a false reason to permit him/her to take the school, and obtained permission therefor (hereinafter referred to as 'the grounds for disciplinary action of Article 2).
3. Before a school meeting on July 5, 2013 and on March 21, 2014, the school principal’s abusive language and abusive language (hereinafter “reasons for Disciplinary Action 3”) - The other party shall be the school principal.