1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows. Article 1-4(d)(2)(6,624,310 won)(6,264,310 won)(6,264,310 won) of the judgment of the court of the first instance is 16's "No. 1,2, 3, and 16's "No. 1, 2, 3, 5-8(10, 11) and 4-4 of the Enforcement Decree of the Building Act(amended by Presidential Decree No. 25786, Nov. 28, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) is as follows: "No. 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Building Act(amended by Presidential Decree No. 25714, Dec. 1, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply); "No. 25,201 of the Enforcement Decree of the Building Act(amended by Presidential Decree No. 14065, Mar. 1, 2014).

2. The changed part

D. On September 2013, the Plaintiff made 496 square meters out of the instant first-divided land as a site area and made it a building area 64.