logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.08 2017누72098
장해위로금부지급처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, each " March 11, 2014" is replaced by " March 11, 2004."

Article 53(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 22356, Aug. 25, 2010) is replaced by Article 31(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 20875, Jun. 25, 2008); Enforcement Rule of the former Industrial Accident Insurance Act (wholly amended by Ordinance No. 304, Jul. 1, 2008) [Attachment 5].

Part 4 of the decision of the court of first instance is changed to "Supreme Court Decision 94Da42129 Decided December 22, 1995" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 94Da42129, Dec. 22, 1995). Part 4 of the decision of the court of first instance is added to "see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 94Da42129, Dec. 22, 1995". Part 5 of the decision of the court of first instance is changed to "the date on which the argument of this case is closed" in Part 13 of the decision of the court of first instance is closed. Part 5 of the decision of the court of first instance is changed to "III," Part 5 of the decision of first instance is changed to "No. 1, 1995," Article 113 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act to "No. 21, 2010>

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate.

arrow