logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.10.30 2013고단2549
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A’s violation of vehicle operation restriction at around 14:05 on February 22, 2007, a defendant’s employee, at the time of the charge [2013 highestest 2550] - the Government District Court Decision 2006 highest 25867 on October 22, 2006:32, a vehicle operation restriction violation at around 204:32, a defendant’s employee

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow