logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고단1636
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction (2013No. 1636) on May 8, 2007 by A, an employee of the Defendant, at around 13:42, May 8, 2007, of the Defendant, [2013No. 1637] A’s violation of vehicle operation restriction on October 12, 2007, a Defendant’s employee;

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow