logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단3742
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A violation of vehicle operation restriction around 19:01 on August 19, 2003 by A, an employee of the Government branch of the Seoul District Court [2013 Height3743] - on June 21, 2003 by the Government branch of the Seoul District Court at around 16:56, June 21, 2003 by A, who is an employee of the defendant, approximately 2003 Height26547, the government branch of the Seoul District Court at around 2003 Height3744, the government branch of the Seoul District Court at around 16:56, the vehicle operation restriction violation [2013 Height3744] - the government branch of the Seoul District Court at around 203 Height1712, the defendant's employee at around 14:10 on December 6, 2002

2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow