1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① The types of misconduct under the attached Table of Article 2 of the Rules on Disciplinary Action on Public Educational Officials, etc. are 1.1. The violation of the duty of good faith in accordance with the attached Table of Article 2 of the Rules on Public Educational Officials, etc.;

C. In the event of a violation of the duty of duties or accounting order, the removal is required to be “where there is a serious and intentional act.” In addition, the Plaintiff added “ difficult to deem that there was an intentional act in breach of duties or negligence of duties in connection with the grounds for the instant disciplinary action.” As such, it is identical to the statement of the grounds for the judgment of the first instance. As such, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the text of Article 420 of the

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.