Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 35,240,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from June 9, 2015 to August 25, 2015.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed as the same.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that manufactures and sells friendly coal panel and freezing equipment, etc., and the Defendant was engaged in freezing equipment and low temperature storage facilities construction business under the trade name of “B,” and was produced and sold to farmers a low temperature storage room for agricultural products by using the leratan panel supplied by the Plaintiff.
B. From March 14, 2014 to June 8, 2015, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with a total of KRW 188,656,00,00, which is a certain standard, to the Defendant. The Defendant paid KRW 153,416,000 out of the amount of the lerarasium up to May 29, 2015 (=18,65,000 - KRW 153,416,000) and did not pay the remainder of KRW 3,524 million (=18,65,00 - KRW 153,416,00).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of recognition as to the claim of the principal lawsuit, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 3,524,00 won for the remainder of the Republic of Korea, and to pay 5% per annum under the Civil Act from June 9, 2015 to August 25, 2015, the service date of the copy of the complaint in this case, from June 25, 2015, which is the day following the date of the last delivery of the Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea.
3. Determination as to the defendant's defense of set-off and counterclaim
A. On April 2014, the Defendant’s assertion that there was a defect, such as the density of leratan in some part of the lerasium supplied by the Plaintiff.
(b).