A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 5, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime around 20:30 on November 5, 2018, and around 20:30 on the same day, at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C from around 20:30 to around 20:45 on November 5, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by forcing the victim to have the victim’s denial of working at the restaurant and to have the two his/her his/her his/her wife paid a cigarette to his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her husband’s answer that he/she did not have a cigarette, and by allowing the victim to enter the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s business by force.

2. 2018. 11. 5. 20:50경 범행 피고인은 같은 날 20:50경부터 같은 날 20:55경까지 위 ‘D’ 식당에서, 위 제1항 기재와 같이 소란을 피워 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 경찰관으로부터 귀가조치를 받아 귀가하다가 다시 위 식당으로 돌아가서, 피해자에게 “내가 뭘 잘못했냐”라고 큰소리치고 “씨발년, 좆같은 새끼, 개새끼”라고 욕설을 하는 등 소란을 피워 피해자로 하여금 주문전화를 받지 못하게 하고 그 식당에 들어오려던 손님을 들어오지 못하게 함으로써 위력으로 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to file a report on field images, one CD, nine closure photographs, two copies of a report processing case, two copies of a report processing case, and Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (victim's telephone reporting);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders shows that the defendant seems to have recognized and against the crime of this case, and that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant as agreed with the victim.