beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of interfering with business on September 14, 2014 shall be acquitted.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On August 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Northern District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and on December 7, 2012, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence at Seongdong-gu District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Interference with business;
A. On October 3, 2013, from around 12:00 to around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed several speeches to the effect that “the victim C (hereinafter “E”) is drunk in a “E” restaurant work in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and without any justifiable reason, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance, such as “hing alcohol,” and making it difficult for customers who were entering the restaurant, to enter the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force; (b) from around 12:0 on September 3, 2014 to around 13:0, the Defendant 200: (c) obstructed male and female customers, who were drunkd in the above “E” restaurant, by drinking in a so-called “E” restaurant; and (d) obstructed the victim’s desire to take part in the restaurant by force on the part of male and female customers, including the victim’s desire to take part in the restaurant.”
B. On July 19, 2014, from around 19:00 to around 19:30, the Defendant ordered alcohol from the “Hju” operated by the Victim F (hereinafter “F”) in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul. However, on the ground that the victim refuses to pay the credit value first, the Defendant expressed a brucing view that “the victim would be able to pay the credit value,” and that the victim refuses to pay the credit value, and the Defendant expressed a brucing view that “the victim would be crus and crus,” and ten cruds of the crus in the above heading door, she could not enter the said heading door, and thereby interfere with the victim’s heading business by force.
C. The Defendant committed a crime with the victim I on September 2014.