logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고단6315
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2015 Highest 6315", together with one person C and D, conspired to collect profits by opening and disposing of another person's mobile phone through forgery of documents, and one person C has made a resolution to take charge of forging resident registration certificates, and the defendant has taken charge of opening his/her mobile phone using forged resident registration certificates.

1. Forgery of private documents, the holding of a falsified investigation document, and the holding of forged public documents;

A. On August 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) conspired with one another with one another; (b) filed an application for the purchase of two cell phones at the “G” mobile phone retail store located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (c) around August 27, 2013, the Defendant stated that “H”, “I” in the resident registration number column, and “I” in the column of each subscriber’s customer name; and (d) written H’s signature in the applicant column, and the Defendant stated “K, Daegu Bank, and L” in the applicant’s account number and deposit note.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with one name C and D, forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of H, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant, in collusion with one another, engaged in the event of the foregoing investigation document, forged official document, and the Defendant held each forged official document and official document by delivering the forged mobile phone application form to M, an employee of the above mobile phone sales store, who is aware of the forgery at the above time and at the above place, as well as the two forged official document, H and K’s resident registration certificate, which are the forged official document, as if the document was duly formed.

2. On August 27, 2013, the Defendant conspired with one another with the victim F and opened a LG mobile phone in the name of H from the “G” mobile phone sales store for the operation of the victim F, as if the Defendant were H, and as if the Defendant were to do so, the Defendant presented the application for entry of the mobile phone in the name of H and the forged H and the resident registration certificate of H and K. The Defendant presented it from the victim F.

arrow