logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고단1464
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, “2017 Highest 1464,” was hospitalized in Pyeongtaek-si E, and was hospitalized in the Medical Care Center at the same time.

G, H, I, and J used their identification cards to open a cell phone in their names and receive a short flag, and then used it to use it in the drinking value, etc., Defendant B, who used the “L” mobile phone sales agent at Osan-si, and Defendant B, who used a copy of the identification card of G, H, I, and J, which was secured through A in order to receive opening allowances from the opening of the cell phone with a higher sales performance, had a new cell phone opened in their names.

1. The crime of forging a private document, uttering of a falsified investigation document, and fraud by Defendant A;

A. On July 9, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) was hospitalized at an agency selling mobile phone at L “L” mobile phone located in K in Osan-si; and (b) was hospitalized in the said F medical care center

G’s resident registration certificate is used at will without the consent or delegation of G, and the application form (M) customer name column of G entered “G”, “N”, and “N” in the address column, and signed by the subscriber column after entering “G” in the subscriber column.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged an application form for mobile phone joining in the name of G, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and forged an application form for mobile phone joining in the name of G, H, I, J, and P in the same manner as the previous list of crimes (1) from the time to January 11, 2016.

B. The Defendant in collusion with B, at the same time and place as the above 1-A, and at the same time and place as that of the above 1-A, as the above 1-A, one copy of the application form for joining the forged G mobile phone from the Defendant is deemed to be a document which was duly formed to the employees of the Ecom Telecom Co., Ltd., who could not know the forgery.

arrow