Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On April 6, 2016, at around 10:05, Defendant A, on the land owned by the victim B (52) in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, around April 10, 2016, reported that the injured party spacks up a stone fence by using a stone stone stone owned by the Defendant, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s face one time due to her head, while resisting the victim.

B. Defendant B, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, was assaulted by the victim A (70) as above, and the victim’s blue blue blue blue blue flue blue blue blue blue blue blue blue b

2. The facts charged of this case are the crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement prepared by the defendants as interest victims, it can be acknowledged that the defendants expressed their intent not to prosecute each other after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case against the defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.