Each indictment against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the head of the household, and Defendant B is a tenant who lives in the house of Defendant A, who is a person who closed and collected.

A. On November 18, 2016, Defendant B: (a) around 08:40 on a house owned by Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and the victim A (the remaining and 73 years old); (b) on the house, Defendant B expressed that “the victim brought the abolition into the house” of the Plaintiff as the revenue manager; (c) but, as the Defendant did not pay monthly rent, the Defendant demanded that the house be cut off; (d) the Defendant did not pay monthly rent; and (e) requested a change in the house, and (e) carried out a dispute, and (e) expressed the victim’s desire to “the victim farb farb ch far farb ch far far farb ch far farb far far farb far far

B. Defendant A’s victim B (e.g., 74 years old) of the revenue entity at the same date and time as the above paragraph A, and at the same place as the above paragraph (a)

“In the expression of the victim’s face at the floor of the victim, the victim abuseds the victim by breaking the victim’s face with his/her hand, and breaking the shoulder.

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the injured party in accordance with paragraph 3 of the same Article.

However, according to the statements made by the Defendants in this court, the Defendants can be found to have withdrawn their wish to punish each other on June 8, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Accordingly, each indictment against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.