All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Public Prosecutor's Office

1. On April 1, 2016, at around 22:58, Defendant A committed assault on the head of the victim B (the victim B) who prevents him from going to go to without paying the drinking value at the D main point where he was located in the 2nd floor of the C Building, on two occasions as drinking, and assaulted the victim’s face face at one consecutive time in the corridor.

2. Defendant B, at the above time and at the above place, she saw the victim A (the victim’s 22 spons, south)’s hallway in the corridor, laid over the floor, and assaulted the victim’s face by putting about about 10 times in the hand floor.

Judgment

The facts charged against the Defendants are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. The written agreement was submitted on May 18, 2016, which was after the prosecution of the instant case was instituted, and the Defendants expressed their intent to withdraw their wish to punish each other. Thus, all the prosecution of the instant case against the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.