beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment called “H” with employment of female employees F and G in Mapo-gu Seoul Etel No. 705 and 1404.
Defendant
A operated the above establishment from around December 9, 2013, around 21:00 of the same month, and around 21:05 of the same month, A had F engage in the similarity act by taking the sexual organ of Defendant B, which was found to be a customer, in hand and scambling, and 1,40,000 won per hour, 1,40 won per hour, and 140,000 won per 1,404 of the above officetel, had G find to be a customer, and then arranged commercial sex acts by receiving 1,40,000 won per hour as a scam.
2. Defendant B
A. On December 10, 2013, Defendant B violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic), around December 21, 2013, Defendant B issued KRW 140,00 per hour to Defendant A in return for sexual traffic and carried out sexual traffic, such as engaging in similar intercourse with female employees F.
B. Defendant B forged private document: (a) around December 10, 2013, after receiving a report from the above Office No. 1404, Defendant B was exposed to sexual traffic from the police officer slopeJ, etc. belonging to the Seoul Mapo Police Station living order division of the Seoul Mapo Police Station, and was called “K,” in the name column of the written statement without authority, “M” in the resident registration number column, “M” in the dwelling space column, and “M 301, Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Internet Reporting Camp on or around December 10, 2013, and received a prior promise from the above Office No. 705, with the instruction of the employees at around 20:00 and around 19:0,000, and without the authority to request the preparation of the written statement in order to be exempted from punishment, and thereafter, I did not have any similarity with the female employees’ sexual intercourse.”