(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.01.11 2017누13354

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.01.11 2017누13354

업무정지 처분 등 취소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 15 of the Enforcement Decree of the Medical Care Assistance Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 26, Dec. 13, 2013; hereinafter “former Enforcement Rule of the Medical Care Assistance Act”) No. 11 of the 4th part of the 6th part of the 6th part of the 6th part of the 4th part of the 4th part of the 11st part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 14th part of the 2nd part of the 4th part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the 14th part of the 15th part of the 20th part of the 2nd part of the 14th part of the 2nd part of the 4th part of the 2nd part of the 4th part of the 2nd part of the 4th part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 14th part.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the business suspension among the plaintiff's claim in this case shall be accepted with the grounds, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit

Meanwhile, according to the records of this case, it is recognized that the validity of the disposition of this case is urgently needed to prevent irrecoverable damage caused to the plaintiff, and no other circumstance exists to deem that the suspension of the validity of the disposition of this case is likely to seriously affect public welfare. Thus, the validity of the disposition of this case is suspended ex officio until the judgment of this case becomes final and conclusive.

참조조문

유사 판례

-광주고등법원 2018.06.28 2017누5828

-대구지방법원 2017.10.18 2016나311252

-대전고등법원 2017.12.21 2017누12450

-대전고등법원 2014.12.11 2014누11791

-대전고등법원 2017.08.30 2017누11501