1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the pertinent part of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

No. 11 to 13 of the second page “the corporate bonds of this case” refers to “USD 83,000,000 Zerdo Coup 209” (see Evidence 4 of this case), the issue value: USD 83,00,000, USD 83,000,000, and 0% of the surface interest rate (zeron’s surface rate is issued at the interest rate) as follows:

(2) On May 4, 209, the due date: USD 150,000, KRW 2000: Gap evidence 8, May 4, 2009, referring to the date of 105,00,000 US dollars 4,209; hereinafter "the corporate bonds of this case") 14, 10, 7, 15, and 13, "the plaintiff's expenses" of USD 15,000 (75,000,000) were paid to the plaintiff 2,000,000,000 US dollars 15,000,000,000,000,00 KRW 2,000,000,000,000,00 KRW 8,000,00,000,000,000,000,000 7,08,00,003).